In my previous post I mentioned biophilic design and that I would go into further detail about it. Here’s a definition from Biophilicdesign.net
Biophilic Design is an innovative way of designing the places where we live, work, and learn. We need nature in a deep and fundamental fashion, but we have often designed our cities and suburbs in ways that both degrade the environment and alienate us from nature. The recent trend in green architecture has decreased the environmental impact of the built environment, but it has accomplished little in the way of reconnecting us to the natural world, the missing piece in the puzzle of sustainable development. (1)
which is making some quite strong claims that I’m not certain are fully backed up by evidence and some say that any health claims are overstated. The Skeptical Specifier goes into more detail in their blog here (2).
So what do I think biophilic design is? In essence I think the term distinction without difference applies. Biophilic design is just good design with a slant to ethical practices and environmental considerations. Designing working and leisure environments which people are comfortable and productive in would be the aim of any good designer even if they didn’t use the biophilic title. When it comes to myself I wouldn’t give myself that distinction but I do enjoy nature, have ethical concerns over the environment and our impact on it so, while we have this brief we may as will stick a tree in the corner…
- Biophilic Design: The Architecture of Life. (2017). Biophilic Design: The Architecture of Life. Retrieved 4 April 2017, from http://www.biophilicdesign.net/
- Is Biophilia Really an Added Value in Architecture?. (2017). The Skeptical Specifier. Retrieved 4 April 2017, from https://skepticalspecifier.wordpress.com/2015/09/01/is-biophilia-really-an-added-value-in-architecture/
- Oliver Heath Design,. (2017). Image of an office with plants.